Showing posts with label Indian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Indian. Show all posts

In the Indian election, 700m voters, 28 days, 250,000 police: world's biggest democratic poll begins

• Gandhi's ruling Congress party remains favourite
• Big players expected to seek coalition partners
Link to this video
When voters in parts of central and eastern India go to the polls today it will mark the start of the largest democratic ballot in history, a rolling wave of voting in five phases that will stretch over a month and demand formidable security measures, given the twin threats posed by Maoist rebels and jihadi terrorists.
To get some idea of the scale consider this: 43 million citizens, more than the adult population of England, have been added to the electoral roll since 2004. More than a million electronic voting machines are to be deployed at 828,000 polling stations. No voter will be more than 2km from a ballot box.
Elections can be violent. In the first phase of polls five years ago more than 20 people died. Although the central government has a million-man army, most election security is handled by a 250,000-strong paramilitary force.
In the light of the terrorist attack in Mumbai last year election policing has been beefed up, and the Indian Premier League, the Twenty20 cricket competition, has been shifted to South Africa as it clashed with the polls.
Ever since the Congress party and the Gandhi family lost their grip on power in 1989 no single party has been able to run India. At the last election the Congress party took only 145 seats out of 543, with 26% of the vote. It took office by sharing power with partners.
Despite the arrival of coalition politics, turnout has remained stable at around 60% and poor minorities are more likely to vote than anyone else.
There are three main groupings: the United Progressive Alliance, dominated by the Congress party; the National Democratic Alliance, built around the Bharatiya Janata Dal; and the Third Front, centred on the Communists. This means that, unlike in Britain or the US, the election will almost certainly not be dominated by a single personality. In an opinion poll this year for the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, a Delhi thinktank, no leader enjoyed 25% approval as a possible prime minister.
The most popular leader is probably Sonia Gandhi, president of the Congress party. Gandhi, 63, who was born in Italy, has proved an astute politician, winning the last election against the odds but refusing to become prime minister, knowing her foreign birth would become too hot an issue. Instead she appointed Manmohan Singh as prime minister, leaving him to formulate policy while she handled the complex deal-making involved in coalition building. She also brought in her son Rahul, 38, who has begun to rebuild the party. Her daughter Priyanka, 37, is a star campaigner who draws huge crowds but so far has not contested an election.
The Congress party, say pundits, is the favourite because it is in power and can point to tangible achievements. For example, it pushed through big pay rises for 4.5 million government employees this year, engendering goodwill in urban areas.
The elite applauded Singh for winning a knife-edge parliamentary vote last year in which he secured a nuclear deal with the US that allowed India to keep its atomic weapons and still be sold nuclear reactors. Most important perhaps in terms of votes, the Congress coalition also set up the first social security scheme in India, guaranteeing 100 days of work to poor households in the countryside. Although the cost is estimated at 400bn rupees (£5.4bn) this year, it should bring in votes among India's 600 million agricultural workforce.
"This scheme has been a real winner for the Congress," said Manoj Joshi, a political columnist. "There is a better mood in the countryside. Some of this is because of good monsoons, but Congress will get the votes."
In the opposite camp is the Bharatiya Janata party, led by Lal Krishna Advani, 81. The party's pollsters say it should win votes based on three main issues: terror attacks, the dynastic politics of the Congress party and the appeasement of minorities, especially Muslims.
These three issues were fused in the uproar over speeches by Varun Gandhi, 29, the great grandson of India's first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru. Although a Gandhi, he has become a mascot for the BJP. In March the budding poet told cheering crowds in a marginal constituency that he would cut the "head of Muslims" (sic) and if anyone raised a finger against Hindus he would "cut that hand".
Another powerful line of attack is that India's economic growth, which has been at 8% for five years, never reached the ordinary man. "What has [he] seen? Price rises, joblessness and poverty," said Sudheendra Kulkarni, an aide to Advani.
However, the real power lies with the regional parties. Congress and the BJP square up in only seven out of 28 states. In almost every other state, the contest boils down to one of the national parties facing a local politician.
The most important of these is likely to be Kumari Mayawati. Her dedicated cadre of workers from the Dalit group (once known as untouchables), and her wooing of the upper castes created an upset in 2007 when her party swept to power in India's most populous state, Uttar Pradesh. Her policies are claimed to be about social justice but in reality are designed to capture jobs through quotas for her supporters. Mayawati's victory in the northern state, which has 80 seats and is considered a bellwether of public opinion, was a political earthquake.
Analysts say Mayawati's significance is the possible emergence of a third national party. If the regional parties coalesce around her, said Mahesh Rangarajan, a political commentator, she could be the "fulcrum of a new power arrangement". If Mayawati gets 40 or more seats, "she is possibly prime minister", he added.
• This article was amended on Thursday 16 April 2009. In the article above we referred to Kumari Mayawati's "untouchable workers". This group of people were known simply as "untouchables". This has been amended.

States asked to remain on high alert around R-Day

NEW DELHI, Jan 24 : The Government of India continues to pay the closest attention to the security situation and to terrorist threats emanating from different organisations. Intelligence is gathered and shared on a 24x7 basis with all agencies of the Central government and the state governments, the ministry of home affairs has said.

Following the conference of chief ministers on January 6, 2009, the state governments have upgraded their intelligence gathering machinery. They have also undertaken a number of measures to prevent and counter terrorist threats.

Nevertheless, there are a number of terrorist, extremist and insurgent groups which continue to pose a serious threat to the security of the country. The period before and after the Republic Day is an especially vulnerable period. Government of India has sensitised the state governments and has asked them to remain at the highest level of alertness.

The Union home ministry has sought the cooperation of the people in preventing and countering terrorist threats and appealed to the people to report suspicious activities and movement of suspicious persons in their neighbourhood to the local police. This can be done by calling the police control room at the district/city level or, where the service is available, by calling the toll free number 1090.

The security forces will be able to discharge their duties more effectively if they have the fullest cooperation of the people, it said.

Should there be certain “selection criteria” for MPs?

As I read about Sanjay Dutt’s rousing welcome in Lucknow, I was remined of a brief email exchange with Dnyanesh from some days back. Dnyanesh asked me my thoughts on what should be the selection criteria for candidates contesting elections for Lok Sabha and legislative assemblies. I shared some ideas with him (below) but I don’t think these are either complete or the best.
I would like everyone’s inputs and suggestions on this…
My initial thoughts are:
Candidates must be able to satisfy the following criteria at the very least:
  • Financially solvent
  • Above 21 years of age
  • Indian citizen
  • Literate
Other proposed criteria (”nice to have”):
  1. Educated to at least higher secondary level
  2. If ever convicted for either a civil or criminal offense, at least two years have passed since their conviction and/or sentence being served
  3. Able to demonstrate professional competence or expertise in at least one area of public policy or management - either in the for-profit sector or NGO or government
  4. Fully conversant in English and at least one other official language of India
  5. Able to declare their assets and sources of income
  6. Able to declare their sources of funding (for the election campaign)
What do you think?
Related Posts:
What is stopping you from joining active politics?

Correct within to fight without

By M Shamsur Rabb Khan


In the midst of serious deliberations and debates on country’s security comes a shocking: news of security breach. How would you react when you know that there exists a cross-border tunnel underneath the fencing along the international border in Rajasthan through which drugs and fake currency were smuggled into Indian Territory? On last Sunday, two alleged smugglers, Iliyas and Eklu, revealed this sensational revelation before the Border Security Force (BSF) officers.
  Then a team of officers took the two to Aman Ka Par border outpost along the international border in Barmer district of Rajasthan and asked them to locate the tunnel. The duo failed to locate the tunnel as it was after dusk that they reached there, but confessed to meeting their Pakistani contacts and accepting consignments from them.

The official sources confirmed smugglers from both the sides prepared the plan jointly and transferred the consignments. However, it is not clear how long the tunnel has been in operation. But it points to the sheer lack of security system in place to guard international border in the face of growing terror attacks on Indian soil. Moreover, it points to the problem of fake currency being supplied into India via such routes being left unguarded. For instance, it has been estimated that by 2010 high quality fake currency indistinguishable from genuine notes could flood the Indian market. In addition to destabilizing the nation’s security through terrorist strikes, the nation’s economy could be crippled through a huge dose of fake currency. Is the government alert to this danger?

Along with tough policy against Pakistan for the recent Mumbai attacks, India needs to think the internal rots that have been plaguing the country for long, which have made the system so vulnerable that anyone can infiltrate the Indian Territory – either from land or sea route. The attacks and their aftermath again point to the rot that has set into the country's internal security system and a lack of cohesion between civilian and security wings of the government. The ‘new age terror’ has brought about missionary zeal with cutting age technological expertise as against the weak, corrupt and vulnerable officials who are easily buyable.

While there can be no doubt that the government cannot provide security to more than one billion people, as some analysts and experts suggest, it has the men and mechanism to contain illegal infiltrations from all three sides – air, land and water. The question is more about proper functioning of the system – from intelligence to policing – than the though new changes are always meant to add extra value to the system. Whether Mumbai terror attacks or almost all such attacks on Indian soil for the last five years, all are the results of system failure – some due to lack of coordination between intelligence agencies and other agencies, some due to professional rivalry between inter and intra-department, some due to negligence and corrupt practices like bribes and favours.

Putting in place a sound system is the greatest challenge before the government. At least we can get some lesson from the terror groups; while terrorists have a definite goal, a focused approach and close, deep-rooted coordination, the counter-terror measures are well short of all these professional values. Shouldn’t we hunt for those who allowed entry to terrorists in lie of some rupees equally as we go after the perpetrators? Do we not catch the person who helped the terrorists in the sea while they asked for a safe passage?

Corruption breeds inefficiency and, in turn, inefficiency brings catastrophe. In fact, the general anger on leaders is the direct manifestation of our unhappiness over the way the system is functioning as well as on men who are running the system. So, what happens when the system is rotten with inefficiency or inefficient people? It becomes vulnerable to each and every external infiltration and alien entry. Moreover, when pressure from seniors and their seniors (who are also corrupt in some way) mounts, panic grips the system like

One reason why blame game in India is so rampant is just because we are so familiar and adept in corrupt practices within the governance system – from top to bottom. One reason why our leaders are so loud and vocal in attacking one another is the fact that all ‘know’ how the others function in the system and vice versa. The Mumbai attacks prove that the whole system is falling apart. At this juncture, border and coastal outposts need intense patrolling and the existence of such a tunnel for intrusion is the height of security breach.